Verify what your AI produces. Stand behind what you send.
The human-in-the-loop layer for organizations that can't afford to get it wrong. Check any AI claim against your own trusted sources, and leave an audit trail. Your sources, your standards, your call.
AI is breaking the thing your organization runs on: being right
Your organization is now producing and standing behind AI outputs it can't double check or trace.
Don't take our word for it.
A working slice of Cothon, checking a real draft against five sources.
Adaptation finance flows: what the 2026 donor cycle should take from the data
International adaptation finance has entered a period of genuine, if uneven, growth. Tracked flows reached $63 billion in 2024, nearly double the 2019 baseline. The headline figure should not be read as sufficiency: the adaptation finance gap is now estimated at $187–359 billion per year, and it widens with every season of compounding impacts.
Where the money goes
Sub-Saharan Africa receives the largest share of adaptation finance of any region, a pattern donors often cite as evidence that prioritisation frameworks are working. Our interview series suggests the picture is more contested: recipient ministries consistently named volatility, not volume, as the binding constraint on planning.
Instruments and delivery
The composition of finance matters as much as its scale. Roughly three-quarters of adaptation finance is delivered as debt rather than grants, concentrating repayment risk in precisely the countries least able to absorb new liabilities. Meanwhile, the private sector accounts for less than 3% of tracked adaptation flows — a reminder of how far blended instruments remain from their promise.
What we recommend
For the 2026 programming cycle we recommend that donors commit to multi-year adaptation envelopes, report grant-equivalent values alongside face value, and co-design pipeline criteria with recipient finance ministries. Each recommendation is developed in Section 4.
Your sources. Your standards. Your call.
You bring the sources you already trust — reports, datasets, PDFs, prior research, the outlets you actually read. Cothon is the double-check.
Every check, on the record.
Cothon logs every verification automatically: who reviewed each claim, which source they checked it against, and when. It builds as your team works, so when a client, a stakeholder, or your own board asks how you know, the answer already exists.
Built for work you can't afford to expose.
The teams we serve handle climate finance, sensitive data systems, and crisis response. Security isn't a feature we added — it's the floor we built on.
Yes. Encrypted in transit and at rest, on keys we control, isolated by project, in a private cloud with no public access.
No. Never. Your documents and sources are never used to train AI models.
Until you delete it, or your account. The full privacy policy has the detail.
Built by people who couldn't afford to get it wrong.
The team behind Cothon has led climate finance, sensitive data systems, and crisis response programs across four continents.
Be among the first to try it.
Book a 30-minute demo and we'll scope a pilot around a workflow your team already owns.
Book a demoPrefer to start solo? Cothon is in private access, onboarded personally by the founders — join the waitlist and we'll be in touch.